| Issue 19 |
December 2003 |
ISSN: 1076-7975 |
||
|
|
||||
| Review:
Conservation in the Internet Age: Threats and Opportunities By James N. Levitt (Ed.) Reviewed by Pramod
K. Nayar |
||||
|
..................................... |
||||
| James N. Levitt (Ed.).
Conservation in the Internet Age: Threats and Opportunities.
Washington, DC: Island Press, 2002.
364 pp. ISBN
1-55963-913-X (paper). US$30.00
Recycled, acid-free paper. This volume is an admirable effort in the direction of
suggesting the harnessing of technology for conservation purposes. The
Internet revolution and conservation are not mutually exclusive or in
conflict, as this volume demonstrates. Communication and transport networks
also facilitate conservation and new dynamics of regional,
demographic, and land use patterns. James Levitt opens the volume with a thorough,
informed historical survey of "networks and nature" in America. Closely
reading the development of railways, roadways, and other forms of transport
and communication, Levitt pays attention to the ways in which exploration of
the landscape and the creation of national parks and forests have frequently
engaged with issues of land use, conservation, and human geography. He
suggests that the Internet, express delivery systems, and other networks are
"key enablers" of deconcentrating settlement and development patterns.
Increased mobility and communication in the last decades of the 20th century
radically altered economic expansion. Levitt notes that people who grew
prosperous with businesses devoted to contemporary technology have also, in
the main, been influential in popularizing novel modes of land use and
conservation. Further, Levitt argues that conservationists now have an
increased set of administrative, educational, and scientific tools at their
disposal. William Mitchell's essay speaks of the
"loosening" of spatial and temporal linkages-what he terms
fragmentation and recombination-among urban activities through use of
digital telecommunication networks. Such networks, Mitchell suggests, enable
extensive distribution of inexpensive decentralized intelligence. We can
also adopt new, network-enabled patterns of development to reinvent the
traditional neighborhood (the theme of the New Urbanists). Mitchell also
sees enormous potential for rural backwaters and smaller communities. Kenneth Johnson's essay deals with the changing
dynamics of rural demography. Noting changes in patterns such as the age of
people out migrating from rural areas and to retirement destinations,
Johnson suggests that urban sprawl and smart growth (concentrated networked
spaces enabling people to work in small towns for employers across the
world) has a serious impact on non-metropolitan areas. Ralph Gross's "Farmland in the Age of the
Internet" begins with a survey of shifting patterns in farm use and
organization in 1990s America. He notes that Americans are spreading out
across the landscape as never before. The rise of the smaller, 35 acre farm
(called ranchettes) alters the productivity of the area. As the population
spreads more thinly across the landscape, farm and forest operations are
severely affected. Gross suggests that GIS and communication technologies
can evaluate conservation and development initiatives (including conflicts
between farmers and developers). Small
farmers and organizations can receive information about development, new
technologies, and employment just as easily as large developers. Local
planning processes are smoothened and marketing of products facilitated even
for small farms in the rural backwaters. James Levitt and John Pitkin explore the impact of the
new technologies in a region in Oregon (Deschutes/Crook Counties). Noting a
variety of changes-from population to employment patterns-Levitt and
Pitkin also focus on potential detrimental effects such as groundwater
pollution, loss of wildlife habitat, and air pollution. They conclude that
while migration to amenity-rich areas is definitely influenced by new
technologies, amenity-influenced migrants are more likely than others to
affiliate with conservation groups. The case study of Greater Yellowstone by Andrew Hansen
and Jay Rotella focuses on the issue of biodiversity. The authors discover
that bird hot spots and grassland dependent species' habitats have changed
considerably. They suggest that integrated assessment and management of
public and private lands, development and use of decision-support tools for
land management, prioritization of lands based on ecological and
socioeconomic growth, and public education will help achieve sustainability. "The Green Internet" by Leonard Krishtalka et al.
concerns biodiversity informatics-an interdisciplinary field uniting earth
systems sciences, computational science, and software engineering. The
National Science Foundation identified bioinformatics as having the highest
priority for knowledge creation in the biological sciences. The Green
Internet is an example of the use of integrated information from terrain,
land cover, climate, and gene sequencing data to create new classes of
biotic information for computational analysis and modeling. The Species
Analyst is Internet-based informatics architecture that helps turn a
museum's varied data archives into networked knowledge.
Using this system, a user can query multiple collection databases
simultaneously-from tracking "human disease" to what is termed "The
Global Biodiversity Information Facility." John Fitzpatrick and Frank Gill also focus on the
Internet as a tool for information retrieval. Using the example of a system,
BirdSource, they demonstrate how local birdwatchers can add to the database.
If each of the 50 million birdwatchers provides information about the birds
they see at their favorite spot, it can help provide detailed scientific
knowledge about geographically specific, long-term biological changes. Jacob Scherr moves the discussion on to conservation
campaigns. Thinkers such as Mark Poster have seen the Internet-as a
democratizing technology. Scherr's essay on the campaign to save Laguna
San Ignacio near Mexico from the planned saltworks demonstrates the use of
the Internet-among other forms of campaigning-in spreading awareness and
garnering resources. The Internet gives voice to people and communities
whose natural resources are being threatened. William Roper and Brian
Muller's essay, "Envisioning Rural Futures," is also a discussion of
local programs. Using a Vermont-based community program as a case study,
Roper and Muller discuss the application of a software program CommunityViz™
-which enabled users to interactively sketch land use scenarios; evaluate
them against community objectives and constraints; view comprehensive
information on the past, present and future impacts of their choice; and
walk through realistic three-dimensional simulations of those scenarios.
The tools in CommunityViz™ enhanced local planning processes
through an expansion of the visual and aesthetic experience, active
community participation, and information supply for analytical purposes. In
a similar vein, Bob Durand and Sharon McGregor's essay looks at
conservation initiatives in Massachusetts. They explore the extensive use of
GIS (Geographic Information Systems) in the area's watershed program
through an easy-to-use compilation of pool data stored on CD-ROMs. Joel Hirschhorn looks at the "new economy" of the
Information Technology (IT) age. Hirschhorn contends that higher growth
rates undermine natural amenities of the region with loss of natural
habitats and demand for development (including leisure and recreational
spaces that frequently prove destructive to natural amenities). Peter Stein
and James Levitt look at the role of network entrepreneurs such as Thomas
Jefferson, Sterling Morton, the Rockefellers, and others. They suggest that
the motivations of these conservation philanthropists are a mix of
enlightened self-interest and social responsibility, and can be of great use
to the conservation movements. James Levitt's concluding essay, "A Call for
Conservation Innovation," reiterates several of the themes addressed by
the individual essays: the power and potential of communications technology
to keep people informed about a variety of data in conservation and to link
people together in social movements, and the sheer financial resources
generated through both entrepreneurial work in IT and more wide-spread
campaigns. Conservation in the Internet Age is a
comprehensive and non-technical introduction to what is surely one of the
most significant prospects of the new technology. Most of the authors in the
volume address the issue of access to information and the use of the
Internet to link communities. The new communication technologies represent a
whole new dynamics of interaction. The
Internet represents a massive multicultural organization; and communities in
cyberspace share some cultural commonalities, a concern for the environment
being one. As the studies in this volume reveal, people have been brought
together because they have experienced similar problems and see the same
threats to biodiversity, despite their geographical differences. This
democratizing potential of a larger public sphere clearly facilitates social
movements, and the essays in the volume are alert to this factor. As for the
Internet as a space of information-nothing more can really be said about
it! The essays demonstrate exactly how the Internet databases enable
extraordinarily thorough research and development programs. A useful volume for urban studies, environmentalism,
and development studies, Conservation in the Internet Age provides
conclusive evidence of the fact that technological development need not
necessarily be at the expense of the local fauna and flora. Neither alarmist
nor techno-fetishist in their approach, the contributors explore the
possibility of stating, after an American writer: the world is a beautiful
place, and it is still worth fighting for. |
||||
|
..................................... |
||||
| Pramod K. Nayar <nayarpramod@hotmail.com>, Lecturer in English, Department of English, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, 500 046, India. | ||||
|
..................................... |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||